Iran could become hell for the United States and its allies
An American aggression against Iran would begin as in Iraq, Libya or Yugoslavia, with the imposition of a "no-fly zone" for Iran's air force in its own airspace. Follow-up of air strikes and US cruise missile launches. But for more than a decade, Iran has devised the most effective response strategies and is capable of unpleasant surprises for Americans.
It is true that the blockade imposed by the United States on Iran's oil exports also benefits Russia somewhat. But stopping the supply of petroleum products from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain would mean a 50-fold increase in costs for Moscow. This is why the Kremlin will not intervene in any way.
Most likely, if it is attacked, Iran will open other fronts, hitting the allies of the United States, Israel and Saudi Arabia (as well as its satellite emirates). Let's remember that on May 14, two Yemeni Qasef-2K UAVs dismantled two pumping stations in the east-west pipeline linking Riyadh to the Yenbu terminal from the Red Sea. The targets are located more than 700 km from the border between Yemen and Saudi Arabia. As a result, their coordinates have been fixed to the GPS.
Guidance for Qasef-2K UAVs, designed and manufactured in Yemen, was via satellite radio retransmission equipment. Saudi Arabia's main gas and oil pipeline was built during the war between Iran and Iraq. It carries out the transfer from the Persian Gulf coast to the Red Sea, it has a length of 1200 km and passes to 70% of the daily production of Saudi Arabia. Being in the desert, the pipeline is not protected by the Saudi army.
It is foreseeable that once attacked, Iran will arm the Yemeni army, loyal to President Ali Abdullah Saleh. This resists four years of invasion by Saudi mercenaries, backed by the United States. Whether at sea or via Oman, Iran can send more and more resources to Yemen to fight the Saudi oil transport infrastructure, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. It can be seen that the entire east coast of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and the Fujairah oil terminal in the United Arab Emirates are within range of Qasef-2K drones.
Israeli warplanes bombed Syrian military targets and the Israeli army supported Islamist terrorists against the Syrian army, although Israel did not declare war on Syria. Russia is now helping the Syrian army to get rid of its old weapons and to acquire new ones. In 8 years of war, Syria has also captured impressive quantities of weapons from Islamist terrorists, via the United States, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Turkey. Iran is the only country to have helped the Syrian army since 2011. That is why it is possible that the second front that Iran will open will be aimed at the deterioration of the internal situation in Israel. Taking advantage of the fury of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, the growing fighting capacity of the Lebanese Hezbollah and the great hostility of the Syrian army.
Valentin Vasilescu
Aviation pilot, former Deputy Commander of the Military Forces at Otopeni Airport, graduated in Military Science at the Academy of Military Studies in Bucharest 1992.
- Tehran prevents Atlantist progress to Moscow and Beijing -
Everything that happens in the Arabian Sea and in the Persian Gulf, between tanker war, incitement and observation, iron will of wills and diplomacy of carpet weaving, suggests the following:
The so-called Iranian-American crisis,
currently taking place in the Persian Gulf, in the Arabian Sea and in the rest of the region, from Yemen to Iraq, through Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, is not an ordinary crisis, but a major strategic battle:
* The Iranian hillock, represented by its geography, its regime and its nation, and the Axis of Resistance, with multi-dimensional Russian-Chinese support.
* The United States of America, totally supported by NATO and the servile Arab regimes in the Arabian Peninsula, as well as the Zionist entity of course.
In a sense, it means ending US unipolar hegemony over the world.
There is no prospect, neither tactical nor strategic, to achieve US objectives, neither in the current open conflict zone nor in other confrontational regions, such as Central Asia, the China Sea or the sea. black / Ukraine. The same goes for the Baltic Sea region of northwestern Russia, where large NATO forces continue to be mobilized near Russia's northwestern borders, near Leningrad, a historic landmark and Russian national, which did not surrender while besieged by German armies for 900 days.
The strategic aspect of the ongoing battle is that Iran is directly confronting US attempts to control not only the oil resources of the Arabian Peninsula and Iran in order to control the energy supplies of the Chinese, Pakistani and East Asian markets. to slow down the economic growth of these countries and weaken their ability to compete with the United States at the international level, but the US objectives go beyond that, because the nature of this confrontation includes, first and foremost, international economic issues. More specifically, Washington and the NATO countries are trying to control the current conflict zone, which extends from the west coast of occupied Palestine to the eastern shores of China and Russia on the Pacific Ocean.
The key to this strategic aspect is the Chinese project Road and Belt Initiative (BRI), which is an international and transcontinental project, which aims to put an end to the economic and financial control exercised by the United States over the capabilities of the peoples of the world.
This means that the current struggle of Iran, with the axis of resistance, against the aforementioned colonial parties, is a battle to impose a strategy, whose goal for Iran and its allies, is:
* Respect for Iran's rights, not only in the nuclear field, but also in the maintenance of maritime security throughout the region, from the Gulf of Aden to the Western Indian Ocean. This is a solid barrier or first line of defense for China's western borders and the southwestern borders of Russia.
* To put an end to renewed tensions in the region by uprooting its origins, namely the intensive US military presence in the Arabian Peninsula and the seas of the region to the South China Sea, especially since the Iranian naval forces are certainly competent and able to effectively secure the shipping lanes.
The desired protection mechanism can be easily implemented thanks to the implementation of the Iranian proposal, presented for months, which provides for the creation of a regional security system in which all Arab and non-Arab countries will participate. Arabs, such as Pakistan and Iran, and the evacuation of foreign bases and fleets from the region.
As for the contingencies in the process of this struggle and its evolution on the ground, they will not go beyond the stage of negotiation "under fire", that is to say that the parties in conflict, in particular Iran and the Axis of Resistance, will continue to take steps to exert military pressure on the enemy, on all fronts, because of their total self-confidence and potential first and their certainty of limited capabilities the enemy then.
When we talk about the limits of the enemy's capabilities, we certainly do not want to say that Iran's military potential is superior to that of the other side, but rather the enemy's limited ability to use its military potential . This is what is called in political science: the limited use of force. This is due to multiple reasons that can not be listed in this context ....
The most important thing to remember is that the current US President does not really intend to wage war on Iran and its allies, besides the fact that President Trump fears that any action against Iran, no matter how limited, can be transformed into a total war that the United States can not afford to risk, because such an escalation would require the deployment of at least 750,000 American and Atlantist troops on the ground. theater of operations in Iran, Iraq and Syria, in addition to the inevitable requiem for the Washington military base in occupied Palestine, "Israel", which will cease to exist in the first hours after the beginning of the war.
As a result, the United States has a frozen, paralyzed or tied up military power due to political and military conditions on the ground, while Iran's command is free to make firm decisions based on objective circumstances and favorable; which makes the objective reading of the theater of operations lead to an incontestable conclusion:
In this confrontation, the most powerful part will certainly be the one that benefits from the geography and the Iranian cultural heritage, the largest and the deepest, on which Imam Ali Khamenei bases himself to lead the battle and share its decisions and directives to the political, diplomatic and military machine of Iran, relying on a dynamic and revolutionary Islamic jurisprudence deeper and more mobilizing than anything traditional politicians can imagine.
A new equation takes shape in international politics and suggests resounding defeats for Americans and their followers, and major victories, unprecedented in the international arena, for Iran and its allies.
By Mohamed Sâdegh Hosseini
Article in Arabic :
http://www.al-binaa.com/archives/article/216476
Login
FAQ
Search
