Zephyr Net


Return to the Fighters Anthology Resource Center

Go to the VNFAWING.com Forums
It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 22:15 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 02:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 12:43 pm
Posts: 377
Location: N/A
The fastest air breathing aircraft now!!



Read this! http://www.nasa.gov/missions/research/x43_suc.html

That is screaming

_________________
"Great pilots are made not born... A man may possess good eyesight, sensitive hands, and perfect coordination, but the end product is only fashioned by steady coaching, much practice, and experience."
Air Vice-Marshall J.E. "Johnnie" Johnson, RAF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2004 15:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
Yes this was the second flight attempt... the first attempt blew up...

I saw footage of this launch live on the NASA channel... Quite an accomplishment...

The engines actually operated on two different fuel types, first one source, then the hydrogen supply, then back to the original source... (cant remember what the mix was)...

Also the fastest seperation speed for a airbreather vehicle ever achieved...

CAG out...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 01:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 19:11 pm
Posts: 2154
Aren't they testing a SCRAMJET? Essentially what they plan to use on future cruise missiles?

_________________
Centurian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 18:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
umnmm, not on cruise missiles, but on the next space vehicle as one of the launch stages...

It would be impossible for a cruise missile to hide from radar at that speed... or to avoid terrain or to fly at low altitude at that speed in that dense an atmosphere...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 31, 2004 19:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 19:11 pm
Posts: 2154
Not according to the US DOD.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... strike.htm

_________________
Centurian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 15:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
Yes and that is NOT a cruise missile, despite its title...

Cent I think they have their termonology incorrect...

Its simply a hypersonic missile... not to different in approach to the old Talos which used a ramjet to accelerate the missile to mach 3... and it was designed by my Dad back in the 50s for the USN as a surface to surface and surface to air missile...


I don't see where this missile actually qualifies as a cruise missile, since it has no wings or other conventional flight controls and relies on thrust and thrust vectoring to fly and not aerodynamics, thus its a regular missile, intermediate ranged...

They may be attempting to classify it as a cruise missle, to avoid some of the SALT II limiations on intermediate missile development, but its no cruise missile, no matter how you look at it...


CAG out...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 16:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 19:11 pm
Posts: 2154
CAG Hotshot wrote:
Yes and that is NOT a cruise missile, despite its title...

Cent I think they have their termonology incorrect...

Its simply a hypersonic missile... not to different in approach to the old Talos which used a ramjet to accelerate the missile to mach 3... and it was designed by my Dad back in the 50s for the USN as a surface to surface and surface to air missile...


I don't see where this missile actually qualifies as a cruise missile, since it has no wings or other conventional flight controls and relies on thrust and thrust vectoring to fly and not aerodynamics, thus its a regular missile, intermediate ranged...

They may be attempting to classify it as a cruise missle, to avoid some of the SALT II limiations on intermediate missile development, but its no cruise missile, no matter how you look at it...


CAG out...


Yes but it has a long range and it cruises to the target at set speed, attacks, and destroys the target. How is that not a cruise missile? Or must a cruise missile be subsonic? As far as I've come to understand a cruise missile is a long range missile launched from aircraft, land, or sea, that has a set flight pattern to the target and impacts the target with great accuracy.

_________________
Centurian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 16:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
actually the missile qualifies as a cruise missile through only one of the requirements... that it is powered by an air breathing engine... However so was the Talos and so is the meteor, and I am sure you would not call either of these weapons cruise missiles...

The other definitions of a cruise missile is that it 'flies' to target via aerodynamic lift with items such as wings or at the very least a lifting body (Like the test vehicle used by NASA in the original description above)...

This missile is more of a cross, its design is that of a standard missile with no aerodynamic assistance for lift and relies on pure thrust to sustain flight, but uses an air breather engine to sustain it...

But in the reality of daylight, its simply a missile, not a real crusie missile, though I am certain the US will use the airbreather engine description to skirt SALT II or START limitations...

CAG out...


Last edited by CAG Hotshot on Fri Apr 02, 2004 13:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 23:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 19:11 pm
Posts: 2154
CAG Hotshot wrote:
actually the missile qualifies as a cruise missile through only one of the requirements... that it is powered by an air breathing engine... However so was the Talos and so is the meteor, and I am sure you would not call either o fthese wepaons cruise missiles...

The other definitions of a crusie missile is that it 'flies' to target via aerodynamic lift wiht items such as wings or at the very least a lifting body (Like the test vehicle used by nasa in the original description above)...

This missile is more of a cross, its design is that of a standard missile with no aerodynamic assistance for lift and relies on pure thrust to sustain flight, but used a air breather engine to sustain it...

But in the reality of daylight, its simply a missile, not a real crusie missile, though I am certain the US will use the airbreather engine description to skirt SALT II limitations...

CAG out...


To hell with SALT and START :) It's non-nuclear anyway, it's conventional so what would be the problem?

_________________
Centurian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2004 13:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
because it can carry a nuclear warhead so it falls under the limitations on intermediate ranged missile development...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group