I posted not sure. Depends on what kind of President we'll have after Bush finally leaves the White House. If it's another trigger-happy war mongerer then yeah, the US will probably go up and do it, Israel might lend a hand. Of course maybe having some evidence of foul play would be nice should the US decide to launch a pre-emptive strike.
Come to think of it, the US is the ONLY country in the history of the world to ever nuke somebody else, we have the most nuclear power generators in the world (I think, not sure about this) and we won't let anybody else even have nuclear power. No nukes have ever been used by anybody to kill civilians except us... Though I'm a little biased against the use of nukes. I don't really feel that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was completely justified, I believe that if the US blockaded Japan (Which was a plausible idea, considering the Japanese Fleet was caput) then the war would still end without sacrificing thousands of American troops. Granted the nuke was faster, but I don't really think it was necessary, but then again I'm thinking the President wanted to scare the Russians... Not trying to piss anyone off, just my two cents. Maybe Iran really does have nukes. Does that mean they'll use them? But think of imagine how we would feel when we think Iran might have nukes. Pretty scared, especially without the "Star Wars" missile defense system, huh? And why is that? Because we feel that we may be killed for absolutely no logical reason at all.
But try to think of how the rest of the world sees us. That's how many see us after Iraq. If you don't have evidence, don't worry about it. We'll just plant it, or make up a just cause.
Kinda makes you stop to think, doesn't it?
|