Sound like a good start, I always were wondering if someone would fix the F/A-18C/D shape problem. Official Janes screw up shape sometime, and I'm very glad that you are fixing all of these shape to look more sharp and realistic looking!
| Zephyr Net http://jkpeterson.net/forum/ |
|
| These are the shapes I will complete this weekend... http://jkpeterson.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1198 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | CAG Hotshot [ Tue May 11, 2004 13:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | These are the shapes I will complete this weekend... |
These are the shapes I will complete this weekend... 1) Create MiG-19 Farmer From Q-5 Shape. 2) F-16C enlarge the inlet, fix the nose and canopy, (attempt) to skin the stabilator... 3) F-18C fix the canopy, fix the 'hole' in the wing you see at certain angles, fix the fuselage shape. 4) Do the same for the F-18D. 5) Create versions of these two aircraft with folded wings for use as scenery aircraft on carriers 6) Enlarge the fixed F-18C/D fuselage, wings and square off the inlets to create the F-18E/F. 7) 'Thin' out the F-15C shape to the proepr proportions o fthe real F-15.. Not a bad list for one weekend, huh? CAG out... |
|
| Author: | Eagle114th [ Tue May 11, 2004 16:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sound like a good start, I always were wondering if someone would fix the F/A-18C/D shape problem. Official Janes screw up shape sometime, and I'm very glad that you are fixing all of these shape to look more sharp and realistic looking!
|
|
| Author: | AIM120S [ Sat May 22, 2004 20:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Other suggestions, though I know you have a huge workload. 1.Alter YF-22 shape into FA-22 shape (move canopy forward, shrink tail fins, shape wings) 2.MiG-17 --> F-86. I'm not sure how the mechanics work, but I'm thinking you could take the tiny radome out of the -17's inlet and turn that into the large cone of the F-86D/L. Also, you could make the Fiat G.91 with very subtle changes to an -86D. 3.Su-7 --> F-100D and F: This plane is sorely underappreciated, and probably wasn't ever included because A) it wasn't a navy fighter and didn't qualify for USNF '97 where the F-105 and A-1 were just scenery... B)It didn't qualify for ATF Gold or Nato Fighters because it wasn't new enough 4.P-51 Mustang (from Marchetti): I bet you can do it, if you can make a U-2 from an F-104. 5.F-16XL: Along with the F-100, I have seen more attempts to simulate this prototype plane in libs than any other (people have used the Gripen, Eurofighter, X-31, etc.). I bet if you increase the horizontal stabilizers' sizes and connected them to the main wings, as well as lengthening the body, you'd be off to a good start. I know you're busy man, but these are just some suggestions. I hope to see some screens of the MiG-19 and Su-9 soon. MiG-19 is one of my favorite MiGs. |
|
| Author: | CAG Hotshot [ Mon May 24, 2004 13:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
No, its fine, good choice, but most are already listed on our EGroup for development.... However, the F/A-22 shape presents alot tougher work... It has no detailed skin and may need to be abandoned in favor of a brand new shape from scratch... I dont know yet, we have some expermentation to do... Why dont you join the VNFAWING EGroup to keep abreast of the developments? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VNFAWING/ CAG out... |
|
| Author: | AIM120S [ Wed Jun 02, 2004 09:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah.... I was denied entry. |
|
| Author: | CAG Hotshot [ Wed Jun 02, 2004 12:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The only person that was denied entry to the EGroup was someone with an obscene yahoo name... Was that you? If so, you have to clean up your act a bit first... If not, then a bug in the system denied you as the above individual was the only person denied in the last year, and you need to re-apply... CAG out... |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|