Zephyr Net
http://jkpeterson.net/forum/

Work on GR6.10 in progress
http://jkpeterson.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=432		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Centurian [ Mon Jul 14, 2003 17:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Work on GR6.10 in progress
Or will I call it 7.xx?

Who knows.

But anyhow for those that have been flying it what do you think needs fixing? I am implementing the SAM sites that use the methods discussed here as well as fixing the names of all British aircraft so Sea Harrier FA2 instead of F/A Mk. 2 and stuff like I had. I fixed the warhead weight of the R-23R/T Apex. The Su-34 has been renamed 'Fullback' and otherwise what have ya'll got for me?

Is the Su-35 the Flanker-E or just Flanker or something else?
Author:  Jimbo [ Mon Jul 14, 2003 18:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
Textures Cent, without looks what is there for me to see? LOL that should be copyrighted or something haha

Jimbo
Author:  Speedy [ Mon Jul 14, 2003 23:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
Hmm... perhaps changing the names of the Russian aircraft to their actual ones instead of NATO ones? It doesn't make that much of a difference, but I just think the Russian names sounded nice...
Author:  Zephyr [ Tue Jul 15, 2003 02:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
Quote:
Is the Su-35 the Flanker-E or just Flanker or something else?


Ehhh I remember Vark111 once called it "Flanker-M" but that's just an arbitrary name: M as in Modfied. I think NATO or whoever does the naming is waiting until these Russian prototypes actually go somewhere. Same story with Chinese planes- I don't know of a codename for the J-10 which is in operational evaluation now IIRC.

Zephyr
Author:  Manoj [ Tue Jul 15, 2003 05:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
Hi,

Havent the ASCC/NATO stopped giving names to new Russian/Non American aircraft?
Calling planes by the names the flyers use is ther best.

MiG 21 = Balalaika 8)
Author:  CAG Hotshot [ Tue Jul 15, 2003 15:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
Actually the RuAF called it the SU-27M Super Flanker...

THey did not accept the new SU-35 designation of the Sukoi bureau..

But since it ws never produced it doesnt much matter...
Author:  Centurian [ Tue Jul 15, 2003 16:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
Spoke to this one guy in Moscow who said the Su-35 was in service already in one squadron. I don't know where they got the money if it is but if so then the Ruskie's got a lot of stuff to work on...
Author:  CAG Hotshot [ Tue Jul 29, 2003 11:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
He is spreading Russian disinformation (they are VERY good at that!)

No SU-35 or SU-27M Flankers or Super Flankers in service anywhere in the world...
Author:  Centurian [ Wed Jul 30, 2003 21:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
I figured that.
Author:  Zephyr [ Wed Jul 30, 2003 22:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
The several Su-35s built are in service with an test/operational evaluation squadron. I don't know if they actually regularly fly.

Zephyr
Author:  Centurian [ Wed Jul 30, 2003 22:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
I wonder where Russia go the money to even build a few test ones.
Author:  CAG Hotshot [ Thu Jul 31, 2003 12:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Work on GR6.10 in progress
Actually none of these aircraft are 'new build' SU-35s or even SU-30s... as Sukuoi(did I spell that right?) has been busy using their 'test' SU-27s heavily modified to represent these new birds and modifying them to suit the new model they want to display. All were built as original SU-27s...
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/