Zephyr Net


Return to the Fighters Anthology Resource Center

Go to the VNFAWING.com Forums
It is currently Fri May 09, 2025 23:57 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 18, 2003 23:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
Absolutley amazing pics of two F-18s that were invloved in a midair and survived...

Truly is a miracle; two heavily damaged aircraft the pilots would have been justified in "punching out" of, but instead they chose to bring the jets in. This endangered their lives but saved the taxpayers about 80 million dollars. What is especially intriguing is in picture 03, notice the radome, radar and all of the avionics equipment, everything, is gone. This created several problems for the pilot: aerodynamics, eventual loss of hydraulics due to loss of fluid, navigation, and probably the most amazing, as the pieces fell away, some debris had to be ingested by the engines (F.O.D.) and he still was able to bring it home. !

Image
Image
Image

The story behind them is : Two F/A-18 Hornets from Top Gun were dog fighting and made a head on pass, just a bit too close. One got home with
part of the left wing and left vertical fin and rudder missing, while the other jet is missing everything forward of the cockpit pressure bulkhead - and is a flying convertible because the canopy is shattered too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2003 02:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 19:11 pm
Posts: 2154
Well I would award those two pilots with a medal for heroism in bringing those birds down without bailing out. They are sure fine pilots to be able to bring those suckers back and at the same time, thats a fine bird to be able to bring back in that condition. I couldn't imagine doing that in an F-16 TBH, maybe an F-14 but not an F-16.

You know one thing, them coming in for landing was a one pass deal. Either they made it or they were going down, especially the one who was running out of hydraulic fluid. LOL maybe HE was an F-14 pilot. They know a lot about loss of hydraulic fluid.

_________________
Centurian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2003 21:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
Whatever they flew previously to get their experience, they did a hell of a job... No wonder they are aggressor pilots... The Best of the Best!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 21:15 pm
Posts: 123
Location: USA
I doubt an F-16 would have survived a similar situation as well.

IIRC, the F-16 used a revolutionary (at the time) gn during production, and I'm sure damage like this would fatally screw up its flight characteristics.

_________________
Image

AIM120S - The Electrician


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 17:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
Well, as I understand it, as long as enough of the control surfaces remain intact and are controllable by the fly-by-wire digital systems, the aircraft should remain flyable... to a much higher degree then previous mechanical systems which, when damaged, rely on over control inputs from the pilot and survive or fail reliant upon the experience of each individual pilot in such a cirsumstance...


Last edited by CAG Hotshot on Mon Jun 14, 2004 14:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 23:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 21:15 pm
Posts: 123
Location: USA
yeah... the computerized correction is cool.

I'd like to see something fly with barely any aerodynamic capabilities.

If it could get airborne and the computers could correct fast enough, it coudl be done.

_________________
Image

AIM120S - The Electrician


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 01:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 00:26 am
Posts: 1409
Location: Mid-Coast USA
Quote:
I'd like to see something fly with barely any aerodynamic capabilities.


it was called the F-4 Phantom!! lol sorry folks, just had to do it :-)

_________________
Fighting for justice with brains of steel

Let your anger be like the monkey which hides inside the piniata.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 17:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 21:15 pm
Posts: 123
Location: USA
I wonder why we used it for so long?

_________________
Image

AIM120S - The Electrician


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 14:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
Because, at the time, it was the best anyone had...

Besides, it proved the fact, that with enough thrust, even a brick will fly!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 15:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 19:11 pm
Posts: 2154
Hell that brick could take abuse and still RTB safely.

_________________
Centurian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
And they lost one for two in combat against lighter, more maneuverable MiGs until tactics were taught to overcome the problems posed by the "Brickness" of the design...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 19:11 pm
Posts: 2154
Yeah well whoever thought that removing a gun was a good idea should have been fired and beaten.

_________________
Centurian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 00:26 am
Posts: 1409
Location: Mid-Coast USA
F-8 Crusader had guns, didnt use them for Air to Air much, I think they got 1 guns victory in Nam

_________________
Fighting for justice with brains of steel

Let your anger be like the monkey which hides inside the piniata.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 14:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 19:11 pm
Posts: 2154
Yes it is true that most aircraft did have guns but most were built before the missile mentality sunk in. Good thing they learned their lesson quickly.

_________________
Centurian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2004 16:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 18:54 pm
Posts: 4437
During the course of the war, F-105 aircrews downed 27½ MiGs, sharing one with a F-4D Phantom crew. 25 of those kills were achieved with the M-61 internal cannon of the Thud, two with AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles.

The F-8 Crusader achieved 18 confirmed "kills" but only two of these were "gun" kills, the others being missile kills (all AIM-9 Sidewinders and within 2 year span of combat, 1966-68.)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group